Recognized as a Leader on Gartner Magic Quadrant for BCMP Solutions, Worldwide

Why So Quiet? The 21st Century Emergency Operations Center

Apr 3, 2014

Back to Veoci BlogWhy So Quiet? The 21st Century Emergency Operations Center

Last week Yale University and the City of New Haven completed a joint four-day Disaster Response training exercise for a “Active Shooter Mass Casualty Incident Drill” in conjunction with FEMA. The exercise was run by the Emergency Management Institute (EMI) as part of Course L930 of the Community-specific Integrated Emergency Management Curriculum (IEMC). FEMA runs about six of these at requestor locations each year.

The exercise was conducted in three rooms physically isolated from each other with, at its peak, 160 participants. Senior management from the University Provost to the City's Mayor stopped by. Auxiliary organizations - Yale New Haven Hospital, American Medical Response (AMR) and others participated as well. Each of the participants had internet-connected devices, and used Veoci as the primary response communications application throughout the drill. 

The overwhelming majority of official information exchange took place using the Veoci platform via well-known input/output methods – typing and reading. One surprising question the the FEMA experts asked at the end of the second day of the drill was “Why so quiet?” This was the second time we had heard this comment. 

The first time was in the City of New Haven's Emergency Operations Center (EOC) during Hurricane Sandy. People in the room noticed how quiet the EOC was during that response as compared to similar activations in the past. During both the Hurricane Sandy response and the Yale-New Haven FEMA training exercise, about fifty people were in each room on average, a big enough number to warrant serious concerns about cross conversations, escalating volume, and general verbal chaos. But the situations never got out of hand - everyone of the participants was on a notebook, PC, tablet or PDA and logged into and using Veoci, using it to communicate and collaborate through organized, efficient channels. There are also several factors that drive verbal exchanges:

  1. Attracting the attention of the subject so that they can listen
  2. Repeating words for the various different people who need to hear
  3. Repeating words due to incomprehensibility caused by issues like noise and cross-conversations
  4. Correcting comprehension mistakes

Further, we are more clear when we write than when we speak – speaking is done with much less pre-mediation or editing. In fast-paced situations with lots of activity, when trying to verbally relate a point, ask a question, or reply to something, ironically enough we end up doing a lot more talking than is necessary. Add this all together and you end up with much more speaking taking place per person than is necessary, more time and effort put into the mechanics of communication rather than actual communication. In contrast, using visual interfaces for exchanging messages leads to clearer communication as the senders can (re)view and edit messages to eliminate ambiguity and provide clarifications that are recorded and can be consumed by everyone later on. In other words, having everything written down and recorded encourages accuracy and lets people go back to what was communicated earlier and be aware of many more communications than just the one that you may or may not have heard correctly moments, minutes, or hours ago. Even more complex is attempting to explain a situation verbally in contrast to sending a photo. 

Noise ProductionSound Level (Decibels)

Jet plane at one mile 90 Diesel truck at 50 ft. 80 Conversation in an office 70 Conversation at Home 60 Library 40 At City of New Haven's EOC during Hurricane Sandy, over 5,000 messages were exchanged for an estimated peak volume of approximately 400 messages per hour. Estimating the average message at 50 words – about a minute of typing - gives an exchange of 20,000 words per hour. These 20,000 words never needed to be uttered out loud.Mode

Words per Minute

Typing 50 Talking/Listening 100-150 Reading 250-300 As an estimate using speech at 125 words per minute, 20,000 words translates to 160 minutes of talking per hour. That would mean, for example, that 2 to 3 people would have been talking continuously during this period if they were to verbalize what was being typed. As a rough (admittedly unscientific) estimate, we can conjecture that inherent problems with spoken communication in active situations with many voices can potentially double the amount of words spoken per person and increase the sound level by eight decibels. EOC Decibels

Equivalent 

It's not surprising that the FEMA experts running the exercise were worried about the reduced noise level; they were used to a very loud EOC, the equivalent of a diesel truck nearby, and what they found here was relative pin-drop silence; with fewer decibels and less repetition, communication became clear. As it turned out, reducing the noise, both literally and figuratively, made the response more accurate, collaborative, and easier to get through. 

Reference: http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/adding-decibel-d_63.html 

Screengrab credit: NBC Connecticut

Subscribe to the Veoci Blog

Receive all the latest emergency, crisis, and continuity management news, tips, and advice

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Related Posts

Practitioners' Profiles: The Firemen of Veoci

John Duddy and Rich Smith are subject matter experts in emergency management and response. They’re not just Veoci team members, but first responders who gear up and run towards a crisis while everyone else heads in the opposite direction. They are firemen: brave individuals who frequently put their lives on the line to protect the personal safety of complete strangers.

Continue reading
Questions to Ask about the PG&E Public Safety Power Shutoff

Pacific Gas & Electric (PG&E), the California-based utility that provides service to almost two-thirds of the state, initiated a public safety power shutoff (PSPS) on October 9th to around 500,000-800,000 of its customers. Most of those customers reside in the northern part of the state in counties surrounding San Francisco and Sacramento. A lesser portion also resides around Los Angeles.

Continue reading
Practitioner’s Profile: Mark Demski's 30+ Years of Public Safety

Here's an account of Mark’s career, the lessons he’s learned, and how he envisions the future of emergency management and response.

Continue reading

Connect with us on Social Media

Join us on our journey to improve emergency, operations, and continuity management!

Veoci Facebook PageVeoci Twitter AccountVeoci Linkedin Company Page

Face crisis and continuity challenges with expert solutions designed for you and your teams.

Learn how Veoci puts you in control