Recognized as a Leader on Gartner Magic Quadrant for BCMP Solutions, Worldwide

Twitter Outages: Clear Markers of Success

Oct 10, 2013

Back to Veoci BlogTwitter Outages: Clear Markers of Success

With the Twitter IPO in the news, it is timely to see how a great site like Twitter manages to stay up so well. For many years Twitter had quite a poor reputation for reliability. After a doozy of an outage in July last year, Christina Warren wrote in Mashable (June 21, 2012), “The uptime was too good to last. At approximately 1:50 p.m. ET, Twitter went down again. Back to Facebook, everyone.  Twitter is down – let's party like it's 2007, 2008 and 2009!”

Twitter’s downtime in 2007 was legendary. The average uptime for 2007 was 98.06%. Twitter was down for 5 days and 23 hours for the year. In December 2007 alone it was down 11 hours. Then Twitter started to improve. By the time of the June 21, 2012 outage, the Twitter VP of Engineering, Mazen Rawashdeh was able to claim in his blog that “for the past six months, we’ve enjoyed our highest marks for site reliability and stability ever: at least 99.96% and often 99.99%. In simpler terms, this means that in an average 24-hour period, twitter.com has been stable and available to everyone for roughly 23 hours, 59 minutes and 40-ish seconds.”

Quite an achievement, going down from 6 days downtime in 2007 to 4 hours in 2012 – almost “four nines” (i.e. 99.99% - see Figure 1). Unfortunately, though, however great a technical achievement that was, Twitter’s fame and widespread usage meant that any downtime had a greater impact on customer perceptions and negative PR.  Not surprisingly, an 11 hour outage 6 years ago when Twitter had 1.6 million tweets is much more palatable than even hiccup when you’ve got 200 million users sending over 400 million tweets daily these days.  And indeed, Twitter managed to make it onto lists like Yotta’s “Top 15 Worst Web Outages of 2012” despite all its uptime gains over the years. Despite negative publicity, the bottom line is that Twitter has done an amazing job. The reality is that most organizations don’t manage to reach 97% for their applications. It takes tremendous discipline and effort to reach >99% uptime. When the Mazen Rawashdeh talks of reaching 99.96% uptime for a few months, it represents a tremendous effort on the part of many teams working together. The effort is three-pronged: (i) reduce the problems that cause the outages, (ii) add redundancy to reduce impact, (iii) improve the process of responding to an outage and reduce the time to recover. Twitter has reduced the number of outages and, perhaps even more impressively, reduced the time to recover from an outage in a noticeable way. Have a look at the following log showing Twitter’s 2013 outages, as well as two “big ones” from 2012 (Figures 2 & 3). Most of the causes for outages in 2013 were unique and did not repeat - there was a new one every time. The complexity of systems and the modes of possible failures can be overwhelming, but given the things we ask of large applications, complexity is inevitable and necessary. System outages are in a different galaxy of complexity – the Twitter outage story for 2013 is just an example of great success. In light of this, the Twitter IPO is exciting. It is the biggest Silicon Valley blockbuster since Facebook to go out for an IPO. The reduction in outages was perhaps one piece that raised the confidence level to go out for an IPO; if Twitter had a four hour outage last month, there would be no IPO this month. If we estimate the IPO to be $10 billion, a four hour outage could have a billion dollar impact. Clearly, Twitter has put some serious effort into preventing that from happening, while also figuring out ways to continually improve their response to the unforeseeable problem that arise. Many organizations suffer less visible but no less devastating effects from outages. The scout's motto applies: "Always Be Prepared". Twitter is a small application with a giant user load. A typical Fortune 500 corporation's systems will never experience the traffic that Twitter does, but they very well could have thousands of applications running simultaneously over a broad range of complexity and usage. Outages will happen. Period. While the user load on Twitter adds considerable complexity to the infrastructure, corporations more than make up for the operational difficulty with the number and diversity of applications, funding constraints, decade-old code and architecture, and the basic problem of retaining people and the application knowledge base. Just as it does for Twitter, all this represents a massive challenge for IT management. In the end, it looks like Twitter's doing a good job of learning from the past and implementing effective strategies to maintain uptime. For  IT management charged with improving the quality of IT service delivery, the Twitter lesson is clear - add redundancy and reduce recovery time from outages while answering these critical questions:

  1. How long before you found out you had an outage?
  2. How long did it take before you assembled the right team to look at the situation?
  3. What was the impact of the outage in dollars?

Despite the unpredictability of outages, these points can be addressed systematically, and continuously getting the numbers down is a clear marker of an effective, evolved response plan. Figure 1: The elusive “nines”

NINES

Uptime percentage

Mins/year

Hrs/year

days/year

1

97.0000%

 15,768.0

262.80

10.950

2

99.0000%

 5,256.0

87.60

3.650

99.2000%

 4,204.8

70.08

2.920

99.5000%

 2,628.0

43.80

1.825

3

99.9000%

 525.6

8.76

0.365

99.9200%

 420.5

7.01

0.292

99.9500%

 262.8

4.38

0.182

4

99.9900%

 52.6

0.88

0.036

99.9920%

 42.0

0.70

0.029

99.9950%

 26.3

0.44

0.018

5

99.9990%

 5.3

0.09

0.004

6

99.9999%

 0.5

0.01

0.000

 Figure 2: Year to Date Twitter Outages for 2013 4-Sep-13 "Some users may experience issues trying to access twitter.com. Access to Twitter on mobile apps is not affected." "Due to a code-related error, a series of web servers went down from 13:48-14:19 PDT, making the twitter.com website inaccessible for some users." 27-Aug-13 20:49 UTC to 22:29 UTC "Viewing of images and photos was sporadically impacted." "DNS registrar: DNS records for various organizations were modified, including one of Twitter’s domains used for image serving" 6-Aug-2013 13:55 UTC to 14:19 UTC "Some users were not able to get to twitter.com or load mobile timelines" "Due to unexpected issues during a maintenance" 3-Jun-13 "Twitter was not available from 1:08pm PDT to 1:33pm PDT.  Some users may have experienced Tweet delivery delay from 1:33pm PDT and 1:53pm PDT." "Due to an error in a routine change" 23-May-13 18:37 PST "Some web users may be experiencing empty timelines and some users may be experiencing an issue with Twitter on mobile devices." "Our engineers are currently working on this issue" 1-May-13 "Some users may be experiencing an issue when uploading a photo." "Our engineers are currently working on this issue. Update: This issue has been resolved." 23-Apr-13 "Some users may be experiencing an issue with our service." Our engineers are currently "working on this issue. Update: As of 8:50am PT, this issue has been resolved." 11-Apr-13 "Some users may have experienced an issue with links contained within Tweets." "This issue has been resolved as of 7:10 am PST." 27-Feb-13 "Some users may be experiencing an issue with our service" "Our engineers are currently working on this issue.Update: This issue has been resolved as of 5am PST." 7-Feb-13 "Earlier today, some users experienced a bug on twitter.com. While scrolling through another user’s profile, it falsely appeared to the viewer that the user had retweeted a Tweet that the viewer hadn’t actually sent." "This issue has been resolved." 5-Feb-13 "Some twitter.com users may be experiencing issues uploading photos from the website." "Our engineers are currently working to resolve the issue. Update: This issue has been resolved." 31-Jan-13 07:00 PST to 9:50 PST "We experienced intermittent issues affecting web and mobile users, globally, 'Twitter is currently experiencing a widespread service outage that appears to be intermittent'." "Some users may be experiencing issues accessing Twitter. Our engineers are currently working to resolve the issue. This incident has now been resolved." 21-Jan-13 "Some users may be experiencing issues accessing Twitter." "Our engineers are currently working to resolve the issue. Update: This incident has been resolved." 16-Jan-13 "Some users are currently experiencing issues with twitter.com and some mobile clients." "Our engineers are working on this issue. Update: This incident has been resolved" Figure 3: Two “big” outages from 2012 26-July-12 08:20 PST down 09:04 recovered 09:15 down again 09:58 Server side error codes 10:25 recovered "Users around the world got zilch from us." "Coincidental failure of two parallel systems at nearly the same time." 21-Jun-12 ~09:00 PT Down 10:10 Rollback to previous version 10:40 Down again 11:08 Full recover begins "Twitter was inaccessible for all web users, and mobile clients were not showing new Tweets." "Cascading bug in one of our infrastructure components. Included rolling back to a previous stable version of Twitter." -Dr. Sukh Grewal, CEO, Grey Wall Software LLC, developers of Veoci 

Subscribe to the Veoci Blog

Receive all the latest emergency, crisis, and continuity management news, tips, and advice

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Related Posts

ITDR Communications: Lessons from a Middleware Bug

Anyone with the will and skill could crack the bug, which spelled serious danger for MuleSoft’s users and those users’ customers. MuleSoft needed to patch the bug immediately. And they did, all while making their customers aware of an issue that could’ve flown under the radar.

Continue reading
The “Magic” of Veoci

As the IT market is replete with contenders, it’s important for companies to stand out from the crowd - getting named by Gartner in the Magic Quadrant is a big boost.

Continue reading
Business Continuity vs ITDR: What are the Differences?

In the past, you may have heard the terms “business continuity” and “disaster recovery” used in conjunction, or even interchangeably, but what do they really mean? You probably won’t be surprised to discover that they have many similar goals when it comes to recovering from an unplanned incident and restoring essential functions, but it is the nuances of their differences that are really crucial to understand.

Continue reading

Connect with us on Social Media

Join us on our journey to improve emergency, operations, and continuity management!

Veoci Facebook PageVeoci Twitter AccountVeoci Linkedin Company Page

Face crisis and continuity challenges with expert solutions designed for you and your teams.

Learn how Veoci puts you in control